Thirdly, and here we have already come to the evidence that has implications for the possession of the subscription on the day of the murder itself, since the accuser was able to prove that (the balance of the paragraph was omitted).
Fourth, at 11:40 a.m. on the day of the murder, subscriber 685 sends a text message "Ahla Burak," in response to a casual greeting that means "Happy Friday" sent to that subscriber, from a number that is not saved on the phone, at 6:52 a.m. that morning. The evidence indicates that the person sending the blessing is none other than Wasfi Alsheikh, a friend of the defendant, who routinely exchanges such blessings with him. And let's recall, at 11:40 a.m., Subscriber 685 is located in the Holon industrial zone, inside the Mitsubishi car, which repeatedly surrounds the deceased's workplace, and waits for him to leave back in the direction of Lod, in preparation for the execution of the murder plan. In these circumstances, the conclusion is necessary that the defendant was the one who answered Wasfi, since the possibility that another person would bother to reply to a casual message, sent many hours earlier, from an unidentified number, to a telephone that is not his own, and which he uses as a purely operational device for the purpose of his involvement in the murder, is a very imaginary scenario.
Fifth, it was proven that on the day of the murder, the access to the WhatsApp application on the phone associated with the 685 subscriber was protected by TA, and the evidence all points to the fact that it was the defendant's fingerprint - he and no one else. Therefore, it was the defendant who responded to Wespy's message and it was the defendant who held the 685 subscription and used it on the day of the murder.
Sixth, the picture is complemented by the fact that at the relevant hours, and contrary to the defendant's typical patterns of use of his phones, and especially in the 401 subscriber, the other devices used by him are in complete silence. He does not make any calls through them, while incoming calls, some of them from close family members, go unanswered. His attempts to provide an explanation for this phenomenon were suppressed and inconsistent and did not correspond to his usual pattern of using his telephone subscriptions.