The defendant claimed that for twenty years he had been moving from apartment to apartment, but did not clarify what were the reasons why he was "moving and wandering." He also said that there was no difficulty in this, he only needed a suitcase or two. He also said that he never purchased any equipment for any apartment where he lived, as they were always well equipped, "I didn't buy a single detail, the house is furnished, where I was furnished houses." His words sounded detached from any reality or logic, especially since he did not want to live in one of his personal apartments that he had purchased for his children, but that they live in the family home at 18 Heroic Street.
In fact, with the exception of Sigal Avioz and his son Ariel, none of his many other children (some of whom were regularly present at court hearings) did not claim, let alone testify, that their father, the defendant, did not live with them during the relevant period. The daughter Stav, who was separated from her home and family, claimed (7 December 2023, pp. 3229 ff.) that her parents had been divorced for as long as she could remember. According to her, her father did not live in the house, but it became clear that in recent years she herself did not live in the house at all, and therefore she had no knowledge of what was happening in the house at the time of her police interrogation (15 September 2021). In her teenage years, she used to meet with the defendant in the Krayot, she knew that he lived in the Krayot, but she never visited his home. Strangely and inexplicably, even though her parents were divorced, they continued to have children, especially since she was middle in the order of birth. Moreover, the family car, the Toyota, was registered in her name in August 2017, but at that time she still did not hold a driver's license, nor did she even take practical driving lessons. Stav's testimony could not shed light on the defendant's place of residence during the relevant period, whereas Ariel's testimony sounded completely false, and regarding the Chevrolet car, it was contradicted by Eliran Sabag's words (p. 1312). Ariel, who testified that he was in a very strong and close relationship with his accused father, claimed that he was not even aware of his father's address, and that he had never visited his home.