It appears that these documents were inadvertently inserted into the exhibits file, but it is not clear how they came into the plaintiff's possession, as they are personal and confidential documents belonging to the plaintiff. It is possible that she presented herself as the defendant's current spouse, despite the fact that they had separated a long time earlier. This conduct in itself creates a great difficulty in the degree of trust that can be attributed to the plaintiff, similar to the situation that was created when she presented herself as a police officer.
- The testimonies indicate that this action was the "straw that broke the camel's back" in the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant, as the plaintiff's sister also admitted (p. 90, paras. 25-28 of the transcript):
"What I know is that my sister the plaintiff when the relationship between her and the defendant was still normal, she informed her that she had left the sperm bank, and she told her that the donor, the father of the minor Y, intended to donate, and that there would be another brother forthe minor, and then they began to get ugly between them. As far as my sister is concerned, she wants to have another child, not on the spot but in addition."
- This request of the plaintiff was perceived by the defendant as a provocation , as also testified by the social worker (p. 73 of the transcript):
- When was the connection between the two completely severed? The Girl and The Plaintiff?
- The Defendant Actually describes from what I understand thatThe Girl She was no longer interested, and then the relationship was cut off, and it faded, until a real break. Distinguishing The Plaintiff It's actually a decision of The Defendant Don't continue the relationship.
- What was the last event between the two before the relationship was severed?
- ... I remember it was an event around the sperm units, The Defendant Claims that afterThe plaintiff's Discovered Sat Pregnant , The Plaintiff She went and purchased sperm units from the same donor. The Plaintiff She claims that it was joint because she wanted him to be a brother toMinor.
- What does this teach you about the reason for the disconnect between The Plaintiff's Daughter?
.........
- The issue of applying for a donation from the same sperm donor shows the complexity between the two, there is a conflict of very high intensity. The Girl It's in the middle."
- The conclusion that emerges from the testimonies is that since the accident, the relationship between the plaintiff and the minor has gradually faded and existed once every few months, with the plaintiff still loving the minor but understanding that at this point in time she can at most serve as a positive figure in the minor's life and maintain a relationship with her. In this context, she also visited the minor with the defendant shortly after her fourth birthday.
However, the moment the plaintiff discovered that the defendant's spouse was pregnant, things changed. The jealousy that gripped the plaintiff made her want to take revenge and conceive at the same time. However, she knew that the defendant objected to receiving a dose from the same sperm donor. Therefore, she contacted the sperm bank together with her mother, provided the defendant's details, received the donor's details, and purchased his last doses from the sperm bank. After this purchase, she informed the defendant that the minor would have a brother from the same father. Since the matter "became ugly between them" (in the words of the plaintiff's sister), the defendant saw the plaintiff's behavior as a desire to take revenge on her by means of control, and from that point on she no longer agreed to allow contact between her and the minor.