Thus and first, Peleg added support to his claim that he demanded payment of the second half of the commission already in April, and Dan admitted to this entitlement – a transcript of a conversation between them dated April 10, 2019. An examination of this transcript shows that in the course of the conversation, although Don admitted Peleg's entitlement to receive an additional monetary commission – based on the provisions of the first agreement, but – apparently since in the framework of the agreement that was presented to the company and approved by the company's board of directors (the second agreement), this was not regulated, Don and Peleg tried to arrange the manner of payment of this fee. Thus, in the same conversation, Don suggested to Peleg (starting on page 18 of the transcript) that in order to transfer the payment, Peleg would issue an invoice every month, "just an example of an electrical appliance store." To this, Peleg replied: "What's the matter?.. What invoice? Invoice from me. What is it? I don't have such fictitious companies." Don also refers to the date when the payment for the commission will begin and says : "It's one. Two,.. years – it should start if not in June and July," to which Peleg replies that everything is fine and asks what sums are involved and for how long. To this question, Don replied: "We said $25,000 for 10 months. Or $20,000 for 12 months." Peleg agrees, but adds that a calculation needs to be done and that the amount is about 250, to which Don replies: "I think it's 250." Thus, it appears from the content of the conversation that the issue of paying the second half of the commission came up already in April 2019, and moreover, the content of the conversation indicates that Don agrees that Peleg is entitled to payment an additional sum of $250,000 and is trying to propose solutions as to how this sum will be paid.
In a parenthetical article, I will note that later in the conversation, the parties talk about the company's situation, the value of the shares, how many shares the company has at that time, and the good work that Ananda did in the IPO (page 31 of the transcript), and then they move on to talking about the elections in Israel. I have found to detail what has been said in order to emphasize that there is no mention in this conversation – there is no mention in the conversation of additional options for shares to which Peleg is ostensibly entitled, and in addition, there is no mention in the conversation that another IPO of the company is expected – even though this is a short period of time prior to the second offering.