The contract between us is signed and we see no impediment to fulfilling it as written and worded, with the agreement of deferring the second payment into two parts for the dates as I wrote above.
Therefore, we will ask to be paid our share according to the contract."
(Attached to this letter was the first signed agreement, as well as the loan agreement dated June 18, 2018).
Later, in a WhatsApp correspondence dated September 11, 2019, Peleg attached the first signed agreement, while the parties had this correspondence between them: Don wrote: "Yes, but this is not the last agreement we signed" Peleg replies: "This is the determining agreement, the others were for your convenience and at your request, and as written, they do not replace the previous one... This is the original and the first... What do you want to do, as the correspondence is written, they don't change... Talk to me on the phone and we'll think together." To which Don replies: "That's why I told you to update the agreement and sign a new one" and Peleg replies: "Why can I give up part of it if necessary... I don't want any more updates, the first determines and you can make agreements on it, but it is a binding document. I talked about updating dates. I don't want to reopen the agreement, there are agreements and we can talk and try to reach agreements for the benefit of everyone, just like I sent you in an email confirming the transfer on different dates."
Don responds: "You have to lower your return on investment." Peleg replies: "I'll talk to Uri... If all the parties agree on everything, it can be written that the parties waive this clause in an accompanying document or confirmation by email," Don adds, and suggests: "Or you can buy shares with some of the money that gives an equivalent to the value of the amount according to the current share price." Peleg answers: "It's completely different from what is written in the contract between the parties and doesn't give me anything unless I want to increase my holdings in the company and I can buy it in the market... I don't understand the logic of this move, but maybe I'm wrong and doesn't see and enlighten my eyes. As I said, there is what is written, and now you can talk about what is done in these and other things and try to reach agreements that are different from what is written in the contract (as long as the parties agree, that's fine." Don writes: "Understand the problem - I will fulfill my part of the agreement, but according to the agreement, you have to buy shares at its value at the value of the $0.16 offering."