Additional things that were said in the interrogation exercise P/12D - In the course of his summaries, counsel for defendants 2 and 3 referred to additional statements made by defendant 2 when he was removed from the interrogation room (P/12D) and walked accompanied by interrogator Zeitun, who had a recording device for the bathroom. During that process, the defendant cried to his interrogator and noted that he was being manipulated and that he was a victim, and later told the interrogator things that the defense claimed were significant. Thus, according to counsel for defendants 2 and 3, in the same words, the defendant tells his interrogator.
Speaker No. 1 Eyal Zeitoun: What did you argue about on the way back?
Speaker No. 2 Munir Asiwi: I'm like a stoned fool.
Speaker No. 1 Eyal Zeitoun: What did you argue about on the way back?
Speaker No. 2: On Hydro I think. You have to smoke, I'm crazy.
Speaker No. 1 Eyal Zeitoun: Except for Hydro
Speaker No. 2: No, Nice Guy. (An unclear word).
Speaker No. 1 Eyal Zeitoun: What else did you argue about?
Speaker No. 2: On material, I want the best.
Spokesperson No. 1 Eyal Zeitoun: No, about drugs, about something else, not about drugs.
According to counsel for defendants 2 and 3 in the above statements, defendant 2 gave the investigator a lead in a time of crisis, but despite this, the interrogator did not try to develop the same details that were given to him regarding an argument about a hydro in the car in which the four returned.
I do not accept the arguments of counsel for defendants 2 and 3 on this specific matter. An examination of the words quoted above shows that in his words defendant 2 indeed said that in the car in which they returned to Lod, there was an argument about "hydro". At the same time, it is not clear from the words that the speaker is talking about an argument about a "hydro" that Muhammad was supposed to bring but he did not bring, and it could also be understood from the words that this was just a defendant trying to convince his interrogator that he did not remember anything because he was "stoned" and he was trying to describe to the interrogator that they were talking about drugs ("hydro" or "nice guy"). He wasn't provided with when he was in the crease and had to smoke, and he needed the best material. In the aforesaid circumstances, the argument that what was said could constitute additional evidence at a reasonable standard to prove the "drug version" should not be accepted, nor can it be said that the words were supposed to lead the investigator to try to develop an investigation line relating to that transaction.