Additional matters to which the accuser sought to address in the written summaries. In the summaries of the prosecution, the accuser responded, inter alia, to the main argument that arose in the case that was conducted against Muhammad in this court in a different panel as aforesaid, on the charge of murder, where it was claimed that the informant's operation was tainted by material defects that necessitated the invalidation of Muhammad's confessions made to the informant. In this case, the accuser claimed that the defense did not deal with this, and did not bring evidence to try to substantiate a similar claim, and therefore it was argued that there was no need to address it.
With regard to the normative framework for convicting defendant 3 of the offense of aiding and abetting murder, which is attributed to him in the indictment, counsel for the respondent sought to refer to the principles outlined in the case law regarding the proof of this offense. Counsel for the accuser argued that according to the evidence available in the case, beyond the fact that defendant 3 did not shoulder the aforesaid tactical burden and did not give any satisfactory explanation, it was proven that there was no substance in his explanations, and therefore she claimed that the assumption had become a reality.
In summary, the accuser argued in her summaries that in light of everything detailed, the defendants should be convicted of all the offenses attributed to them in the indictment.
Summaries of Defendant 1
Counsel for defendant 1 argued in their written and oral summaries that the defendant should be acquitted of the offense of murder attributed to him in the indictment, since the accuser did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt his guilt.
With regard to Muhammad's testimony, it was claimed that Muhammad was not invited for an interview at the State Attorney's Office, and that a preparatory meeting was not held with him, with the intention that he would not answer the accuser's questions, so that the accuser could submit his statements to the informant and the police.