Memorandum- P/39: A memorandum prepared by the examiner on April 7,2024, in accordance with the videos that the driver of vehicle A submitted to the examiner Valdi regarding the field of vision, and the examiner wrote as follows:
"I watched the videos provided by the driver of Car A, and I identified the area of photography as Route 3415
K"From 7-8, the aforementioned is seen driving once from the direction of his arrival and once from the direction of the arrival of vehicle B when there is daylight.
Here"It is heard to say that there is no field of vision in the place and that it cannot be seen that he is deviating from the path
The second.
It should be noted that this has nothing to do with the field of vision since the field of vision experiment was conducted at night When it is dark in place and can only be seen by road/passage lights."
Interrogation of the Defendant - P/43 :
Question : Tell me What happened on 12/04/2023 at 21:26 on Route 3415 in an accident?
Answer: It was one of the hardest rains I've ever seenI was driving in my lane, with no car in front of me.
And behind me there is no vehicleI am alone in the lane, suddenly a car appeared in front of me, I don't know which
TypeI only saw lights coming up in front of me, I reacted instinctively, I don't remember exactly what
I didI believe in normal actions, until the boom, until we stopped, I don't know how to describe in words, until a moment
The Accident.
....
Question: What was the weather at the time of the accident?
Answer: Very windy, rain with strong intensity.
Question: I mean exactly the moment of the accident.Was there a respite in the rain?
Answer: At the moment of the accident, the honest ones worked on their highest intensity, it rained but still
See the road.
Question: How would you define visibility at the time of the accident?
Answer: You can see the road.
Question: Do you also notice separation lines? In the platform strip?
Answer: See.
Question: Were you with high or regular lights?
Answer: Regular.
Question: What was your speed before the accident?.
Answer: I can't say because I didn't look at the speedometer, I was driving at a low speed
This is what is allowed on the road because the weather conditions did not allow driving at the speed limit on the road.
Question: How much is it permissible to travel there?
Answer : 80 km"Q.
Question: What was the condition of the road at the time of the accident?
Answer: The road is wet from the amount of rain, but perfectly normal, I drove on this road for an hour
Before.
Question: You say wet from the rainIs the road wet or full of water like a pool/puddle?
Answer: Wet, but completely normal.
...
Question: What route did you take before the accident?
Answer: In the right lane in the direction of my travel.
Question: Is the road lit?
Answer: The road in this section is not lit.
Question: When did you first notice the second car?
Answer: There were vehicles that passed byI don't know how often to say it, and that I see it already in my path
And boom.
Question: The place of the accidentIs it an alignment or a curve?
Answer: I've been there a few timesI tried to identify the point, if I succeeded it was a straight road, and there is
Makoko Line Name, all the curves on this road have a continuous separation.
Question: So I understand from what you said that you traveled your pathAnd suddenly you noticed the lights in front of you?
Answer: Accuracy.
Question: Did you have time to respond?
Answer: I guess it is.I don't know how to answer that, I think I reacted instinctively.
Question: Did you see other vehicles driving in front of you at that moment?
Answer: I don't remember telling youI don't think there's any other reason for it to get into my path if
It did not go for a detour.
Question: Where on the road did the collision occur?
Answer: In my path.
Question: Do you know how the collision happened?
Answer: I really don't know how to submit it.
Question: Did you see the other vehicle during its deviation or when you first saw it it was
Was it in your lane?
Answer: I didn't see her movement.I saw her in front of me, I must have seen the movement
The diagonal, it's hard for me to tell you her travel route, if there was a sharp deviation or a leak
Slow.
Question: How long before the collision do you notice its lights?
Answer: I don't know how to answer that..
Question: Do you know if it had regular or high lights?
Answer: I don't remember that she It dazzled me.
Question: If you remember diagonal movement to your lane, so apparently the reason for the deviation was not
OvertakingRight?
Answer: I think it was an overhaulI don't know how to say it for sure, but I don't
No explanation for why she suddenly appeared in the lane in front of me.
...
Question: Where did your car stop after the accident?
Answer: In my lane facing in the opposite direction slightly diagonally.
Question: I tell you that according to the findings and signs on the road, the collision occurred in the lane
of the other vehicle and you swerved from your lane to the opposite laneWhat do you have to say about that?
Answer: I was alone in my pathI had no reason to go her way.
Question: The place of the accident, this is a curve to the right in the direction of your travel, you may have been driving fast or
You didn't notice the road and as a result you were thrown out "Out" to the opposite lane?
Answer: There can be no such thing.
...
Question: I show you a picture of the accident site from the direction of your travel., and we see that there is no
Ability to see the movement in front of you before the collisionSo how did you explain that you saw her movement?
Into your path? (The interrogation shows a picture.) - A.H.B.)
Answer: There were lights in my lane.
Question: I tell you that there are witnesses who drove behind her who said that you swerved into the opposite lane,
What do you have to say about this?
Answer: I don't think it's true or possible.
Question: Why is it not possible?
Answer: Because no. I had no reason to go into her lane, I was in my lane alone, and I didn't overtake.
Question: Do you want to add something?
Answer: No."