In other words, in the post after your and (the plaintiff's) separation, you still write to (the plaintiff) what an amazing mother she is. Earlier you told us that during the marriage they write all kinds of things here, you are already separated and don't live together, you still write to her what an amazing mother.
- I don't want it to sound like I'm criticizing the court, if the court were emphasizing On the violence that took place at home and The use of the drug In a difficult way and not in the form of ending the day with fun, the danger and the drugs and the violence and the things that are approved by her as there is in the transcript If the court had emphasized these things you would have understood that these words that I wrote on social media it was because I myself was in a kind of mental exaltation not a kind ofI was afraid to stop these stops in those moments And also the inhibitions I made regarding the posts in our other exhibits that I ask her to stop uploading pictures of A. to the networks. That's what I wrote."
"I wrote. There was no real intention for these words, just like there was no intention in the first place to be a part of it. And the fact that I didn't anchor it and that I didn't make an agreement with her was clear to me wholeheartedly that she was only mine and that there was no threat from me."
- The defendant also brought the minor to the wedding of the plaintiff's sister, in which she served as a bridesmaid, as the defendant admitted (pp. 149-150 of the transcript).
- The conclusion is that in the period after the separation and prior to the accident, efforts were made to maintain the relationship between the minor and the plaintiff, which naturally was less frequent than in the past. Despite the signing of the separation documents at the offices of "New Family", no document relating to the minor was signed.
- The fading of the relationship after the accident:
- As noted above, on September 15, 2021, the plaintiff suffered a serious car accident while riding a scooter on her way to work, when another vehicle hit her and fled the scene. The plaintiff was hospitalized and then transferred to a number of rehabilitation frameworks, including Beit Levinstein and another rehabilitation center. During this period, the frequency of meetings with the minor gradually decreased, both due to the plaintiff's complex medical condition and due to her preference not to meet the minor in the presence of the defendant's spouse, as detailed below.
- Shortly after the accident, there was still proper communication around the encounters with the minor.
Thus, for example, the defendant sent a WhatsApp message to the plaintiff, in which she wrote to her: