It is possible that the plaintiff relied on this statement and was of the opinion that despite everything, what was stated in it could be relied upon. However, it would have been appropriate for her to exercise caution and insist on a parenting agreement.
- In practice, the more it became clear to the plaintiff that the presence of B. (the defendant's spouse) became more significant in the minor's life, the more the plaintiff distanced herself from the minor.
- On June 21, 2022, the plaintiff left the WhatsApp group of the kindergarten children, when she learned that B. (the defendant's spouse) was in this group (Exhibit 19, p. 67 of the defendant's exhibits file). It was found that once again, it was the presence of the defendant's spouse that dictated to the plaintiff her conduct toward the minor. The plaintiff could have been expected to remain in the WhatsApp group of the children's parents in the kindergarten in order to receive direct information about the minor, without any connection to the defendant's spouse. The fact that the plaintiff chose to leave the group raises a difficulty with regard to the plaintiff's perception of parenthood towards herself, and hence with regard to the intention of joint parenthood.
- On June 14, 2022, the plaintiff stopped transferring money to the defendant, as she admitted in her testimony (p. 36 of the transcript). The defendant claimed that the transfer of funds for the minor stopped close to the accident and from that date onwards the plaintiff transferred money to her only for a joint loan they had taken, while the plaintiff claimed that she also transferred money for the minor until June 2022, but her admission that at that time she stopped transferring any funds to the defendant, together with her statement that she did not see fit to transfer money when she was not meeting the minor, Raises a difficulty.
The following is the plaintiff's testimony in this matter (p. 34 of the transcript):
- I refer you to paragraph 17 of the statement of claim. You claim that after your accident you could not continue to send money to the toddler's economy due to the loss of livelihood and that you had an accident on September 15, 2021. Refer to Appendix 57, pp. 601-608 on your behalf. Feb 2020, May, June, July, Aug, Money Transfer toDefendant. This means that in section 17 you were not able to support the toddler, but you are attaching references that are being carried out in banking transactions. How does it work?
- I transferred funds from the day of separation including 10 months when I live in--, this is in 2020. The account statements are after the accident. The minor was given food, craft games, money, etc.. The money transfers were made to repay a joint loan as well as for The child5. For the minor ILS 1,200 per month and for the loan ILS 800 per month. Except for those 2,000 shekels that I transferred every month, when I was with The Girl Twice a regular week and on Saturdays, I would buy her creative games, clothing, etc.
With regard to the transfers of the additional amounts, since I was previously in the bankruptcy bank, we managed from the defendant's account, meaning that I transferred the salary tothe defendant and that is how we would proceed. The salary from the police.