The claim of false recording of the defendant's statements in the minutes of Investigator Aya is a suppressed claim that was first raised during his testimony in court as the prosecution's claim, which is inconsistent with the defendant's testimony in the main interrogation, where he stated that his interrogation by Aya was proper (p. 109, paras. 12-13). In addition, the allegation was not made against Interrogator Aya in her cross-examination, while the transcripts of his additional interrogations with the ISA were submitted with full consent and while the defense waived the interrogators' interrogation.
Moreover, and as the prosecution claims, among the other examples in which it should be shown that the interrogator Aya wrote the memorandum in accordance with the defendant's words, his description in the main interrogation of the mental crisis he suffered and which was among other reasons for his consumption of different appeal contents (pp. 101-102, 29 May 2025): "I would follow everything, browse, enter, see, even this (unclear) website that I knew, I would go in and see this, and there is nothing, I have nothing to do, I don't have... " (ibid., paras. 19-20) – was found to be consistent with his description of this matter in his interrogation before the interrogator Aya (P/13), and further indicates the depth of his addiction to ISIS content.
The defendant also denied the content of his statements to the police and claimed that he had not read his interrogations by Officers Haim and Abud, and when confronted with his handwritten signature on his interrogation by Officer Haim (P/6), he was clever in replying that his signature on the interrogation was correct only in relation to the first page of the interrogation where his warning was found (Prov. 29 May 2025, pp. 113, 135).
His claim that Policeman Haim pressured him and asked him to sign his interrogation was also raised for the first time during his testimony in court. Not only was this claim not hurled at Policeman Haim during his testimony in court, but even during his main interrogation, the defendant's attorney, Attorney Avigdor Feldman, reiterated that the defense did not dispute the defendant's confessions to the policeman and that "it's a waste of time, everything is fine" (p. 176, paras. 16-34).