It should be emphasized that as detailed above, Defendant 1 was in the Mazda vehicle at the time of the execution of the acts, of driving after the Ford vehicle along several streets and in several neighborhoods, slowing down the vehicle and making another turn in the roundabout and exiting immediately after the shooting was committed, Defendant 1 was the driver of the vehicle, (even if he did so under Muhammad's instructions).
Under the aforementioned circumstances, it would be impossible to assume that a person who was in the Mazda did not realize that he was monitoring the Ford vehicle. The fact that the Mazda vehicle in which defendant 1 was in was waiting next to and behind the deceased's car, which he followed for several minutes, will necessitate the conclusion that it was clear to the passenger that it was a matter of surveillance and waiting for the purpose of murder and not only for the purpose of surveillance.
As noted above, it was also proven in our case that defendant 1 traveled with Muhammad and defendant 2 to the territories of Judea and Samaria for the purpose of bringing the Mazda vehicle, in which defendant 1 was also in fact at the time of the surveillance of the girl. It was further proven above that Muhammad and Defendant 1 left their mobile phone in the city of Lod when at the time of the murder Muhammad was using an "operational" phone that was not his usual one.
All of the aforesaid will indicate that defendant 1 knew very well that this was not a trip for the purpose of locating drugs or even for the purpose of surveillance for the purpose of harming the deceased, but rather it was a trip whose purpose was to organize an unidentified vehicle for the purpose of committing the offense and leaving a mobile device in the area of the city of residence and the use of an "operational" phone, followed by thorough surveillance of another vehicle and waiting next to the same vehicle, and the beginning of the slow driving of the vehicle. Immediately after the shooting began, even before the shooter returned to the vehicle, it could only have been done for the purpose of committing murder, beyond any reasonable doubt.