"Now the same story was with Natan Harpaz, that Natan brought this Russian woman, he said she wanted to work as an accountant and that's it, I told him, talk to Uri, he told me something, talk to you, look, he had a relationship with Uri, but he wanted me, so he said something with them, we'll take her to be the manager of this company.
Araldo: What kind of company are you talking about?
Three: ICCCT, I know, I don't even know the names of the companies, I took her, I made an appointment with her in Tel Aviv, I saw a nice woman... And I sent her to the Postal Bank to open an account, she opened two bank accounts, I told her to bring me the checks.
Araldo: And the notebooks she ordered?
Three: Yes, and she signed all the notebooks for me. I told her to wait for me at home now, and Ori had to give her some employment. Uri didn't let her."
In his testimony in court, Natan Harpaz referred to Ms. Ella Fishman, saying : "This is a client of mine from the firm who was looking for a job at the time, she was looking for a job for a few months and Mr. Chelouche then asked for someone to handle the affairs of these companies, and I suggested that she meet with Chelouche and take the job, he was looking for someone who would deal with all the administration and operate these companies." (p. 1704 of the transcript, paras. 6-9).
Natan Harpaz confirmed that he had asked to open a bank account in the name of the two companies, noting that their business manager was Mrs. Fishman.
From the combination of what Yehoshua Shlosh gave to defendant 3 in the recorded conversation, with the testimony of Natan Harpaz regarding Ms. Fishman, it is possible to learn about the involvement of defendant 1 in the management and operation of the companies JCC and ICT. In this regard, the prosecution pointed to the fact that the companies JCC and ICT were registered on August 22, 1999, whereas the decision of the board of directors appointing Ms. Fishman as the company's manager was dated September 14, 1999, i.e., three weeks later, and this shows that defendant 1 was: "also responsible for the fraudulent registration of the companies and not only for their use".