A supplier of a company demanded that a shareholder of a company, who was also in practice its CFO, be required to personally pay the company debts for goods supplied, after presenting him with presentations that the company cash flow difficulties were easy and not a real financial hardship with an apprehension of non-payment and he continued to issue checks and sign them The Court attributed the company debt to the shareholder personally as he managed the company with thin capitalization and hid its true financial situation from the company creditor. A personal liability of a company shareholder will be imposed in exceptional cases where the special conditions for piercing the corporate veil are met. Managing a company in a state of thin capitalization, which occurs when the company equity or asset inventory is not sufficient to cover the company liabilities, is a prohibited use of the incorporation veil because the shareholder 'enjoys' the company profit prospects, but does not share the risks of loss - which are rolled over to the shoulders of the external creditors. Additionally, an organ of a company is not exempt of personal liability if acted in an undue manner towards third parties. In this case, the shareholder knew that the company debts exceeded the value of its assets but despite this the company continued, with his knowledge, to order goods and issue future checks without cover. In addition, his role in the management of the company included personally signing company checks, and accordingly reviewing its financial conduct, therefore he had a duty of care towards the supplier as part of the general duty of care of a CFO in a company vis-à-vis its creditors who rely on his representations. Therefore, the shareholder is personally liable for the company debts.
Published in Afik News 375 30.11.2022
Related articles
One cannot deduct from an employee’s salary to cover future expenses
Sports Law
Labor Law
Dispute Resolution
Wage deductions under the component of a “deposit” were made from the salary of a brazilian football player who played for the Maccabi Haifa football club during his final months of employment. The said deductions were intended to secure the payment of the player’s future expenses, such as debts for traffic fines, housing bills, and […]
A Broker may be entitled to brokerage fees from related parties in the event that it served as an “effective cause” for the transaction
Mergers and Acquisitions
Dispute Resolution
Commercial, Banking and Financial
A middleman entered into an agreement with parties to an acquisition transaction, under which it was intended to receive brokerage fees. After the deal fell through, some of the involved parties established a new company that ultimately executed the deal and made the acquisition, without paying the brokerage fees. The Court held that the middleman […]
The Maritime Court in Israel has the jurisdiction to arrest any vessel anchored in Israel and to hear in rem claims against it
Maritime, Aviation and Transportation Law
Dispute Resolution
A fuel supplier from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, supplied fuel in Turkey and Malta to a Russian-registered cargo ship and sought to enforce a maritime lien against the vessel in Haifa in respect of a debt. Meanwhile, the ship was sold to another owner who repudiated the fuel supplier’s maritime lien. The Court dismissed the […]
In a commercial independent contractor agreement, a party does not have the unilateral authority to impose an interim state of unpaid suspension during a dispute
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Labor Law
Dispute Resolution
Natan Zehavi, a Radio Le-Lo Hafsaka broadcaster provided broadcasting services to the radio station as an independent contractor. Following a controversial on-air statement, the station suspended the broadcaster without pay and refused to reinstate him without receiving new financial guarantees on his part. However, the station refrained from formally terminating the agreement, thereby keeping his […]