A supplier of a company demanded that a shareholder of a company, who was also in practice its CFO, be required to personally pay the company debts for goods supplied, after presenting him with presentations that the company cash flow difficulties were easy and not a real financial hardship with an apprehension of non-payment and he continued to issue checks and sign them The Court attributed the company debt to the shareholder personally as he managed the company with thin capitalization and hid its true financial situation from the company creditor. A personal liability of a company shareholder will be imposed in exceptional cases where the special conditions for piercing the corporate veil are met. Managing a company in a state of thin capitalization, which occurs when the company equity or asset inventory is not sufficient to cover the company liabilities, is a prohibited use of the incorporation veil because the shareholder 'enjoys' the company profit prospects, but does not share the risks of loss - which are rolled over to the shoulders of the external creditors. Additionally, an organ of a company is not exempt of personal liability if acted in an undue manner towards third parties. In this case, the shareholder knew that the company debts exceeded the value of its assets but despite this the company continued, with his knowledge, to order goods and issue future checks without cover. In addition, his role in the management of the company included personally signing company checks, and accordingly reviewing its financial conduct, therefore he had a duty of care towards the supplier as part of the general duty of care of a CFO in a company vis-à-vis its creditors who rely on his representations. Therefore, the shareholder is personally liable for the company debts.
Published in Afik News 375 30.11.2022
Related articles
A car import license may be denied renewal also based only on industry-wide competition considerations, and not due to any act or omission by the importer
Competition
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
Dispute Resolution
The Ministry of Transport refused to renew the direct import licenses of a motorcycle importer for both Yamaha and Kawasaki brands, ruling that the license could only be renewed for one of them. The Supreme Court dismissed the importer’s appeal on competition grounds. The Israeli Law for the Licensing of Services and Professions in the […]
In the absence of a written document in a real estate transaction, the official recording prevails over oral agreements
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Dispute Resolution
Following a family dispute, a father moved to evict his son from a residential apartment in his ownership after the son and his family resided in the property for years without payment of consideration and without a written agreement. The Court granted the eviction claim. A commitment to grant a gift in real estate is […]
Favoring associates in the provision of services does not constitute prohibited discrimination under law
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
An individual evacuated from his home following the outbreak of the “Swords of Iron” war and accommodated in a hotel was demanded to move to another hotel, for reasons of required renovations while a group of evacuees associated with a hotel employee was allowed to stay. The Supreme Court rejected the contention of illegal discrimination. […]
Mutual transfer of rights between relatives in a partition of property is not a “transfer without consideration” and may trigger a betterment levy
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Taxation and Government Incentives and Funding
Dispute Resolution
A brother and sister, who received three apartments from their father as a gift and recorded them under joint ownership, signed a partition agreement. Under the agreement, they transferred rights to one another to establish exclusive ownership of each apartment (“distribution in kind”), but refused to pay a betterment levy, contending that the transfer was […]