A supplier of a company demanded that a shareholder of a company, who was also in practice its CFO, be required to personally pay the company debts for goods supplied, after presenting him with presentations that the company cash flow difficulties were easy and not a real financial hardship with an apprehension of non-payment and he continued to issue checks and sign them The Court attributed the company debt to the shareholder personally as he managed the company with thin capitalization and hid its true financial situation from the company creditor. A personal liability of a company shareholder will be imposed in exceptional cases where the special conditions for piercing the corporate veil are met. Managing a company in a state of thin capitalization, which occurs when the company equity or asset inventory is not sufficient to cover the company liabilities, is a prohibited use of the incorporation veil because the shareholder 'enjoys' the company profit prospects, but does not share the risks of loss - which are rolled over to the shoulders of the external creditors. Additionally, an organ of a company is not exempt of personal liability if acted in an undue manner towards third parties. In this case, the shareholder knew that the company debts exceeded the value of its assets but despite this the company continued, with his knowledge, to order goods and issue future checks without cover. In addition, his role in the management of the company included personally signing company checks, and accordingly reviewing its financial conduct, therefore he had a duty of care towards the supplier as part of the general duty of care of a CFO in a company vis-à-vis its creditors who rely on his representations. Therefore, the shareholder is personally liable for the company debts.
Published in Afik News 375 30.11.2022
Related articles
A website may publish public verdicts and is not obligated to remove them upon request of a person appearing in such verdicts
Privacy, GDPR, Confidentiality and protection of reputation
Dispute Resolution
A legal website automatically collected judgments published by the Directorate of Courts and published legal proceedings involving an individual over the years. The publications included identifying details such as: ID number, signature, and personal information regarding his medical condition, all from public proceedings. The Court dismissed the demand of the person whose details were included […]
Signing an irrevocable power of attorney by a gift grantor indicates a waiver of the right to withdraw and there is no need for an agreement
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Domestic Relations
Dispute Resolution
A brother signed an irrevocable power of attorney and forms for the transfer of real estate rights, which he inherited from his father, to his sister in a gift transaction. The siblings reported the transaction to the tax authorities as required by law, however, the rights were never recorded at the Land Registry in the […]
A testamentary provision made under duress, threats, deception, fraud, or exploitation of the testator’s weakness shall be voided
Wills and Estates
Dispute Resolution
After the father’s death, it was revealed that he had bequeathed all his property, including a business, a residential apartment, and bank accounts, to his daughter, who lived with him and cared for him and his wife in their later years, while each of her two brothers inherited ILS 10. The Court accepted the objection […]
In the absence of proof of the authenticity of the first transaction in time, it does not have a preferential right by virtue of the laws of conflicting transactions
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Dispute Resolution
A woman petitioned for recognition of land rights in East Jerusalem by virtue of a series of transactions based on a power of attorney from 1999, while the purchasers contended that they had lawfully purchased the rights directly from the heirs. The Court dismissed the claim because the woman failed to prove her rights to […]