A supplier of a company demanded that a shareholder of a company, who was also in practice its CFO, be required to personally pay the company debts for goods supplied, after presenting him with presentations that the company cash flow difficulties were easy and not a real financial hardship with an apprehension of non-payment and he continued to issue checks and sign them The Court attributed the company debt to the shareholder personally as he managed the company with thin capitalization and hid its true financial situation from the company creditor. A personal liability of a company shareholder will be imposed in exceptional cases where the special conditions for piercing the corporate veil are met. Managing a company in a state of thin capitalization, which occurs when the company equity or asset inventory is not sufficient to cover the company liabilities, is a prohibited use of the incorporation veil because the shareholder 'enjoys' the company profit prospects, but does not share the risks of loss - which are rolled over to the shoulders of the external creditors. Additionally, an organ of a company is not exempt of personal liability if acted in an undue manner towards third parties. In this case, the shareholder knew that the company debts exceeded the value of its assets but despite this the company continued, with his knowledge, to order goods and issue future checks without cover. In addition, his role in the management of the company included personally signing company checks, and accordingly reviewing its financial conduct, therefore he had a duty of care towards the supplier as part of the general duty of care of a CFO in a company vis-à-vis its creditors who rely on his representations. Therefore, the shareholder is personally liable for the company debts.
Published in Afik News 375 30.11.2022
Related articles
A shareholder who is not personally a party to an arbitration agreement will not be added to the arbitration proceeding to which the company is a party
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A controlling shareholder in a company was added as a party to an arbitration proceeding, even though he is not personally a party to the arbitration agreement, but rather the company. The Supreme Court held that there was no reason to add the controlling shareholder to the arbitration proceeding by virtue of piercing the corporate […]
A pre-marital asset may become joint property if treated as such during the marriage
Notarial Prenups
Notarial Services
Domestic Relations
A married couple built and managed apartments on land the wife had received as a gift from her father prior to the marriage with the land and apartments recorded on her name only, but the income from these apartments was deposited into a joint bank account. After 23 years the couple divorced and the husband […]
A claim will be stricken-off if a foreign claimant deposited a guarantee for the expenses of the defendant and failed to complete it after use
International Transactions and Dispute Resolution
Dispute Resolution
An American claimant and a company from the Marshall Islands sued in an Israeli Court and were required to deposit a guarantee for the defendant’s expenses, but after part of the guarantee was used to pay expenses, they did not complete it to the original amount. The court found that the claim should be struck […]
The decision whether to give a bonus to an employee after the end of employment is at the discretion of the employer
Labor Law and Immigration
Dispute Resolution
An employer announced that it intends to grant a bonus to employees for past achievements in two installments. The employer refused to grant the second half of the bonus to an employee who announced her resignation, because she would no longer be deemed an employee on the date of the second payment. The Court rejected […]