A supplier of a company demanded that a shareholder of a company, who was also in practice its CFO, be required to personally pay the company debts for goods supplied, after presenting him with presentations that the company cash flow difficulties were easy and not a real financial hardship with an apprehension of non-payment and he continued to issue checks and sign them The Court attributed the company debt to the shareholder personally as he managed the company with thin capitalization and hid its true financial situation from the company creditor. A personal liability of a company shareholder will be imposed in exceptional cases where the special conditions for piercing the corporate veil are met. Managing a company in a state of thin capitalization, which occurs when the company equity or asset inventory is not sufficient to cover the company liabilities, is a prohibited use of the incorporation veil because the shareholder 'enjoys' the company profit prospects, but does not share the risks of loss - which are rolled over to the shoulders of the external creditors. Additionally, an organ of a company is not exempt of personal liability if acted in an undue manner towards third parties. In this case, the shareholder knew that the company debts exceeded the value of its assets but despite this the company continued, with his knowledge, to order goods and issue future checks without cover. In addition, his role in the management of the company included personally signing company checks, and accordingly reviewing its financial conduct, therefore he had a duty of care towards the supplier as part of the general duty of care of a CFO in a company vis-à-vis its creditors who rely on his representations. Therefore, the shareholder is personally liable for the company debts.
Published in Afik News 375 30.11.2022
Related articles
Withdrawing a bid after being declared the winner may grant the tender committee the authority to forfeit the bid guarantee
Public Law, Elections Law and Tenders
Dispute Resolution
A bidder that won an Israel Land Authority tender for a lease of a plot withdrew its bid, contending that essential information regarding the scope of building rights had been concealed. The tender committee forfeited ILS 400,000 of the bid guarantee (approximately 25% of the total guarantee). The Court rejected the petition and held that […]
In the absence of a will setting otherwise common-law spouses inherit from each other as married spouses
Common-Law Marriages Agreements
Wills and Estates
Intergenerational Law (Trusts, Estates, Lasting Powers of Attorney, Parenting)
A woman passed without a will, having been unmarried but lived with a couple for over 20 years. The Court found that the couple is a common-law spouse for purpose of inheritence. The Israeli Inheritance Law stipulates that in the absence of a contrary will, common-law spouses inherit from each other as married spouses. For […]
Absent of explicit reservation by the maritime carrier on the bill of lading constitutes prima facie evidence that the cargo was in good order and condition upon delivery
Maritime, Aviation and Transportation Law
Dispute Resolution
Amidst the discharge of an oil cargo in Israel, contamination by foreign agents was revealed, thereby depreciating its value. The cargo owners contended that the maritime carrier is liable for such contamination, predicated upon the clean pre-loading laboratory reports and the clean bill of lading, wherein the carrier confirmed the cargo is “in apparent good […]
“Football is played from Saturday to Saturday” and players’ salary includes weekly rest indemnity and the off-season is considered vacation utilization
Sports Law
Labor Law
Dispute Resolution
Two Israeli Premier League football players demanded from their teams, after their employment ended, payment for weekly rest indemnity on Saturdays, and redemption of vacation days. The Labor Court held that the clubs do not need to pay for weekly rest indemnity and vacation redemption. Generally, the Israeli Wage Protection Law prohibits a salary that […]