A supplier of a company demanded that a shareholder of a company, who was also in practice its CFO, be required to personally pay the company debts for goods supplied, after presenting him with presentations that the company cash flow difficulties were easy and not a real financial hardship with an apprehension of non-payment and he continued to issue checks and sign them The Court attributed the company debt to the shareholder personally as he managed the company with thin capitalization and hid its true financial situation from the company creditor. A personal liability of a company shareholder will be imposed in exceptional cases where the special conditions for piercing the corporate veil are met. Managing a company in a state of thin capitalization, which occurs when the company equity or asset inventory is not sufficient to cover the company liabilities, is a prohibited use of the incorporation veil because the shareholder 'enjoys' the company profit prospects, but does not share the risks of loss - which are rolled over to the shoulders of the external creditors. Additionally, an organ of a company is not exempt of personal liability if acted in an undue manner towards third parties. In this case, the shareholder knew that the company debts exceeded the value of its assets but despite this the company continued, with his knowledge, to order goods and issue future checks without cover. In addition, his role in the management of the company included personally signing company checks, and accordingly reviewing its financial conduct, therefore he had a duty of care towards the supplier as part of the general duty of care of a CFO in a company vis-à-vis its creditors who rely on his representations. Therefore, the shareholder is personally liable for the company debts.
Published in Afik News 375 30.11.2022
Related articles
Failure to issue a tax invoice/receipt and misuse of the incorporation veil may justify piercing the corporate veil
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A company that was hired to carry out renovation work in a residential apartment entered into liquidation procedures. The shareholder was required to personally compensate the customers for damages and many defects discovered in the works. The Court accepted the claim in part and held the shareholder is personally liable for defects and damages, due […]
Disclosure duty during negotiations does not apply to information that was visible and known to the parties
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Real Estate
Dispute Resolution
A business owner leased a space in Nesher for the purpose of operating a minimarket. A short time later, the municipality began extensive infrastructure works for the construction of metro lines, as part of which the service road was blocked and the parking lot near the leased area was demolished. The Court rejected the claim […]
Commercial use of an image documenting a work of art without the artist’s consent or giving it credit constitute a copyright infringement
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Copyright, Trademarks Media and Artists
Dispute Resolution
In a commercial advertisement of a company, which sought to illustrate its services in the field of transportation of artwork, appeared a photo from an exhibition documenting the artwork by a Bezalel graduate alongside a commercial inscription and the company’s logo stamped on it. The company did not receive the artist’s consent to such use […]
Transferring security footage to a third party may be infringement of privacy
Privacy, GDPR, Confidentiality and protection of reputation
Dispute Resolution
A café let a third party watch security footage which was then uploaded to a Facebook post accusing a woman of theft. The Court held that the giving the footage to a person who does not have a position in the café constitutes an infringement of the woman’s privacy. Under the guidelines of the Israeli […]