A supplier of a company demanded that a shareholder of a company, who was also in practice its CFO, be required to personally pay the company debts for goods supplied, after presenting him with presentations that the company cash flow difficulties were easy and not a real financial hardship with an apprehension of non-payment and he continued to issue checks and sign them The Court attributed the company debt to the shareholder personally as he managed the company with thin capitalization and hid its true financial situation from the company creditor. A personal liability of a company shareholder will be imposed in exceptional cases where the special conditions for piercing the corporate veil are met. Managing a company in a state of thin capitalization, which occurs when the company equity or asset inventory is not sufficient to cover the company liabilities, is a prohibited use of the incorporation veil because the shareholder 'enjoys' the company profit prospects, but does not share the risks of loss - which are rolled over to the shoulders of the external creditors. Additionally, an organ of a company is not exempt of personal liability if acted in an undue manner towards third parties. In this case, the shareholder knew that the company debts exceeded the value of its assets but despite this the company continued, with his knowledge, to order goods and issue future checks without cover. In addition, his role in the management of the company included personally signing company checks, and accordingly reviewing its financial conduct, therefore he had a duty of care towards the supplier as part of the general duty of care of a CFO in a company vis-à-vis its creditors who rely on his representations. Therefore, the shareholder is personally liable for the company debts.
Published in Afik News 375 30.11.2022
Related articles
Publishing a false factual statement during a live broadcast may give rise to defamation liability for the publisher, but not necessarily for the broadcasting channel
Privacy, GDPR, Confidentiality and protection of reputation
Dispute Resolution
Channel 14 host – Ynon Magal – contended during a live broadcast that Guy Pelege – a well-known journalist – did not serve in the IDF, or alternatively, was discharged after two days, whereas in fact, the journalist completed a full and lengthy mandatory and reserve military service. The Court partially accepted the lawsuit and […]
An intimate conversation in the workplace does not necessarily constitute sexual harassment
Labor Law
Dispute Resolution
A manager of a startup company sought to terminate the employment of the company’s human resources manager due to professional disagreements. In an attempt to smooth things out between them, the two held a personal conversation in which the manager shared his sexual orientation with the employee, as part of a personal conversation. The National […]
The Court may approve an arrangement between a public company and warrant holders, subject to due publication and the absence of objections
Capital Markets and Stock Exchange Regulations
Dispute Resolution
A public company sought to reach an arrangement with warrant holders to extend their exercise period and petitioned for relief. The Court granted the motion and approved the arrangements reached by the public company with the warrant holders. Under the Israeli law, a company wishing to reach a compromise or arrangement, including with warrant holders, […]
Making significant efforts may not be sufficient to exempt a director from criminal liability for operating without a business license.
Criminal Law
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
A director of a company that operated a business for several years without a business license, as required by law, was charged with liability for violating the law, despite the fact that he had made tremendous efforts and worked tirelessly to obtain a business license. The Court held that the director bears criminal liability because […]