A supplier of a company demanded that a shareholder of a company, who was also in practice its CFO, be required to personally pay the company debts for goods supplied, after presenting him with presentations that the company cash flow difficulties were easy and not a real financial hardship with an apprehension of non-payment and he continued to issue checks and sign them The Court attributed the company debt to the shareholder personally as he managed the company with thin capitalization and hid its true financial situation from the company creditor. A personal liability of a company shareholder will be imposed in exceptional cases where the special conditions for piercing the corporate veil are met. Managing a company in a state of thin capitalization, which occurs when the company equity or asset inventory is not sufficient to cover the company liabilities, is a prohibited use of the incorporation veil because the shareholder 'enjoys' the company profit prospects, but does not share the risks of loss - which are rolled over to the shoulders of the external creditors. Additionally, an organ of a company is not exempt of personal liability if acted in an undue manner towards third parties. In this case, the shareholder knew that the company debts exceeded the value of its assets but despite this the company continued, with his knowledge, to order goods and issue future checks without cover. In addition, his role in the management of the company included personally signing company checks, and accordingly reviewing its financial conduct, therefore he had a duty of care towards the supplier as part of the general duty of care of a CFO in a company vis-à-vis its creditors who rely on his representations. Therefore, the shareholder is personally liable for the company debts.
Published in Afik News 375 30.11.2022
Related articles
In an “heir after heir” provision in a will the first heir is entitled to do with what he received from the estate “as if it were his own.”
Wills and Estates
Intergenerational Law (Trusts, Estates, Lasting Powers of Attorney, Parenting)
Dispute Resolution
In a mutual will made by a couple an arrangement was established for heir after heir under which upon the death of one of them, his estate would pass to the surviving spouse and after the death of both spouses the estate will be inherited by their two daughters. Upon the wife’s death, her husband […]
One who induces a client to trade in the capital market while presenting false representations in bad faith may be personally liable to compensate them.
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A woman traded in the capital market through an Israeli company. The company representatives acted under fictitious identities, presented themselves as certified advisors, promised false “bonuses,” and applied continuous pressure on her to deposit funds while concealing material risks and without a proper license. As heavy losses accumulated and after she requested to withdraw her […]
An employer is not permitted to use the tips received by his employee to pay social benefits without the employee’s consent
Labor Law and Immigration
Dispute Resolution
Waiters employed at the luxury restaurant “Segev” received their salary from a shared tips pool. In 2019, the restaurant unilaterally decided, without the employees’ consent, to deduct 20% from the tips to fund social benefits and related contributions. The employees objected to the change and even took organizational steps to oppose it. The National Labor […]
It is forbidden to use a company name which may mislead the public that it is another company
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A man founded a company with a name that includes his full name. Thereafter, members of his family founded a company with a name that also includes the shared surname and deals in the same areas of activity. However, after decades of activity and an agreement between the parties that the first company would be […]