An employee was surprisingly terminated after 15 years of employment, due to the deteriorating in her health situation and without the employer raising any argument regarding her professional performance. The Court held that although the employee was the one to file the claim, the burden of proof to show legitimate reasoning for termination is on the employer. The employer did not meet the burden of proof for a relevant motive to terminate and therefore the Court determined that the reason for dismissal was illegal due to her medical condition and temporary physical disability.
Published in Afik News 213 14.09.2016
Related articles
Familial proximity does not by itself rule out the existence of an employment relationship
Labor Law
Dispute Resolution
A lawyer was employed as a salaried employee in a law firm owned by her husband and the National Insurance Institute refused to pay maternity pay contending that she worked as an independent contractor, inter alia, because her salary as an employee significantly exceeded her husband’s profits, no employment contract was signed and no replacement […]
The existence of defamation is determined by the message conveyed to the viewer, not by the publisher’s intent
Privacy, GDPR, Confidentiality and protection of reputation
Intellectual Property, Copyrights, Trademarks, Media and Artists
Dispute Resolution
Following a radio interview on channel 103, in which Yossi Langotsky, the father of the deep-water gas field discoveries in the Mediterranean Sea, warned against deteriorating into civil war amidst the public debate, Channel 14 personality Yaakov Bardugo delivered a monologue that same evening accusing Langotsky of threatening violence, calling for his arrest, and referring […]
A Claim That a Contract Clause is Merely a Sham Requires a High Standard of Proof
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
An agreement for the provision of furniture transport and assembly services existed between two companies, which either party was entitled to terminate with 60 days’ notice. After several years, the transport company requested to replace the agreement with an engagement with a sister company but because the sister company required this in order to finance […]
Cancellation of general meeting resolutions due to a defect in the summons does not demand restoring the situation to its previous state in the company
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
Following the passing of the controlling shareholder in a family company, two-thirds of his shares passed to his heirs, while his partner, holding one-third of the shares, remained the sole director of the company. When a dispute arose between the parties regarding the arrangement of the management structure in the company, the heirs, who had […]