The Israeli Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1988, is designed to prevent businesses from placing “obstacles” on the normal course of competition in the market and, inter alia, prohibits the existence of a cartel (or, "restrictive agreement"). Until recently the law included a blanket exemption for reciprocal exclusive distribution agreement. A recent amendment stipulates that as of the end of August, 2015, this exemption will be canceled and exclusive distribution agreements will be subject to the general provisions of the Israeli Antitrust Law. The Israeli legislator granted the market an adjustment period in order to ensure compliance with the new legal requirements and the drafting of new agreements where necessary
Published in Afik News 171 04.02.2015
Related articles
The Israeli Court is the proper forum to adjudicate a restrictive arrangement, even when all parties to it are foreign corporations
Competition
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
Dispute Resolution
Foreign corporations were sued for damage caused to Israeli consumers due to a restrictive arrangement to which they were parties. Within this framework, they coordinated prices, quantities and bids in the manufacturing of a component integrated into hard drives. The Court held that the Israeli Court is the proper forum to adjudicate the lawsuit. To […]
A car import license may be denied renewal also based only on industry-wide competition considerations, and not due to any act or omission by the importer
Competition
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
Dispute Resolution
The Ministry of Transport refused to renew the direct import licenses of a motorcycle importer for both Yamaha and Kawasaki brands, ruling that the license could only be renewed for one of them. The Supreme Court dismissed the importer’s appeal on competition grounds. The Israeli Law for the Licensing of Services and Professions in the […]
Penalizing customers for reducing their purchase volume constitutes a prohibited harm to competition when applied by a monopoly
Competition
Dispute Resolution
The Central Company for Beverage Distribution Ltd., which is a monopoly in its field, included in its agreements with its customers an option to cancel the agreement in the event of a reduction in the customer’s purchases and the Director General of the Competition Authority imposed a fine thereupon. The Supreme Court held that the […]
A supplier who terminates an engagement with a distributor because the distributor refused its demand for price coordination breaches an agreement
Competition
Dispute Resolution
A gas products marketer, which sells products to several distributors, demanded that a store owner, with whom it had worked for 15 years, not advertise products at a price lower than the price it set. After the store owner objected to the demand, contending it is a forbidden restrictive arrangement, the distributor stopped supplying its […]