The Israeli Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1988, is designed to prevent businesses from placing “obstacles” on the normal course of competition in the market and, inter alia, prohibits the existence of a cartel (or, "restrictive agreement"). Until recently the law included a blanket exemption for reciprocal exclusive distribution agreement. A recent amendment stipulates that as of the end of August, 2015, this exemption will be canceled and exclusive distribution agreements will be subject to the general provisions of the Israeli Antitrust Law. The Israeli legislator granted the market an adjustment period in order to ensure compliance with the new legal requirements and the drafting of new agreements where necessary
Published in Afik News 171 04.02.2015
Related articles
A car import license may be denied renewal also based only on industry-wide competition considerations, and not due to any act or omission by the importer
Competition
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
Dispute Resolution
The Ministry of Transport refused to renew the direct import licenses of a motorcycle importer for both Yamaha and Kawasaki brands, ruling that the license could only be renewed for one of them. The Supreme Court dismissed the importer’s appeal on competition grounds. The Israeli Law for the Licensing of Services and Professions in the […]
A supplier who terminates an engagement with a distributor because the distributor refused its demand for price coordination breaches an agreement
Competition
Dispute Resolution
A gas products marketer, which sells products to several distributors, demanded that a store owner, with whom it had worked for 15 years, not advertise products at a price lower than the price it set. After the store owner objected to the demand, contending it is a forbidden restrictive arrangement, the distributor stopped supplying its […]
Prosecuting only some of those involved in an antitrust crime does not necessarily constitute selective enforcement
Competition
Criminal Law
An indictment was filed against 17 defendants for committing the offenses of a restrictive arrangement, receiving something by fraud, and money laundering, although 50 were originally involved in the case. The prosecution decided who to prosecute based on parameters reflecting the severity of the acts. The Court held that the criteria subject to which the […]
A motion to certify a class action relying solely on a criminal indictment may be summarily dismissed
Competition
Dispute Resolution
A motion to certify a class action was filed against supermarket chains, alleging they were parties to restrictive arrangements intended to harm competition and raise prices. The motion relied solely on an indictment filed by the Israeli Competition Authority. The Court summarily dismissed the motion to certify the class action. Summary dismissal of a claim […]