The Israeli Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1988, is designed to prevent businesses from placing “obstacles” on the normal course of competition in the market and, inter alia, prohibits the existence of a cartel (or, "restrictive agreement"). Until recently the law included a blanket exemption for reciprocal exclusive distribution agreement. A recent amendment stipulates that as of the end of August, 2015, this exemption will be canceled and exclusive distribution agreements will be subject to the general provisions of the Israeli Antitrust Law. The Israeli legislator granted the market an adjustment period in order to ensure compliance with the new legal requirements and the drafting of new agreements where necessary
Published in Afik News 171 04.02.2015
Related articles
A monopoly may set different prices for different parties operating in the market but do not compete with each other
Competition
Public Law, Environment and Tenders
Dispute Resolution
A collector of empty beverage bottles for recycling contended that a collection corporation, which is a monopoly in its field, owed it payment for the difference in bonuses due to it, after discriminating it in comparison to other beverage bottle collectors from among the marketing chains. The Court held that the collection corporation did not […]
A clause in a tender that prohibits coordination of bids prohibits the very disclosure regardless of whether it resulted in damage to the competition
Competition
Public Law, Environment and Tenders
Dispute Resolution
A number of affiliated companies under the same ownership submitted bids in a tender for the construction of 5 residential and commercial complexes and each won the tender for a complex. As the terms of the tender stated that each bidder in the tender can win a single complex and is forbidden from coordinating offers, […]
Cancelling a European merger goes against EU competition laws if there is no risk of market concentration
European Law and Regulations
Competition
Two companies with material market share in the field of genetic screening merged into a single entity. The EU Concentration Commission received a complaint from a third party that the merger is hindering EU Competition law and sought to cancel the merger. The Court held that the merger should not be cancelled although both companies […]
A private entity which is not a monopoly may refuse to provide a service to a client
High-Tech and Technology
Competition
Commercial, Banking and Financial
A blogger in the field of entertainment news in Israel engaged with an advertising network operated by Google which allows site owners to sell advertising space on their sites. After the advertising network froze the blogger’s account and unilaterally terminated the agreement between the parties, the blogger contended that the termination of the agreement constitutes […]