A director and a controlling shareholder of the company filed a claim asking the court to recognize him as an employee of the company and to grant him all the rights to which he is entitled to as an employee, for the services he provided to the company as a director. The court held that in order to determine the nature of the relations between the parties and to determine whether labor relations existed between them, it is not sufficient to determine the agreements between the parties. Also, a director acting only as part of his position on the board, and even if he receives any compensation for that service, is not considered as an employee of the company. Since in this case the director failed to prove by the combined test that there are indicators that he is an employee of the company (since this was not his only job, since he did not have an office in the company, and many other indicators), the court rejected the claim.
Published in Afik News 231 24.05.2017
Related articles
An organ in a company cannot be both liable because of its position and independently
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
People who entered into transactions with a company contended that a director was liable to them for failed transactions – once by virtue of her position as a director, and once personally for her actions. The Court rejected the claim. Israeli law stipulates that a company is liable for an action performed by its organ. […]
A bankrupt person cannot file class claims or other proceedings without prior approval of the officer appointed to such person
High-Tech and Technology
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A bankrupt person filed a class-claim against the Afik & Co. law firm, as well as against many other businesses, alleging non-compliance with the website’s accessibility requirement, when he did not make any prior approach and when it was a duplicate lawsuit and when certain businesses had already compromised with him and paid him money […]
An intention to marry may be an indication to lack of a common law marriage status
Domestic Relations
Notarial Prenups
Dispute Resolution
Shortly before her wedding, the to be bride was killed in a car accident. The insurer refused to compensate the spouse. The Supreme Court accepted the insurer’s contention and held that the spouse is not entitled to a common-law spouse status. A condition for the recognition of common-law marriage is the couple’s intention to apply […]
A participation in a joint venture does not grant a right to receive accounts if no partnership relationship existed between the parties
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A college and a private person established a joint venture in which a pest control course was offered at the college. The college financed the course and also undertook to bear the losses, while the person built the course structure. The person contended that he did not receive the profits he was entitled to from […]