Published in Afik News 167 10.12.2014
Related articles
An employer is not permitted to use the tips received by his employee to pay social benefits without the employee’s consent
Labor Law and Immigration
Dispute Resolution
Waiters employed at the luxury restaurant “Segev” received their salary from a shared tips pool. In 2019, the restaurant unilaterally decided, without the employees’ consent, to deduct 20% from the tips to fund social benefits and related contributions. The employees objected to the change and even took organizational steps to oppose it. The National Labor […]
The decision whether to give a bonus to an employee after the end of employment is at the discretion of the employer
Labor Law and Immigration
Dispute Resolution
An employer announced that it intends to grant a bonus to employees for past achievements in two installments. The employer refused to grant the second half of the bonus to an employee who announced her resignation, because she would no longer be deemed an employee on the date of the second payment. The Court rejected […]
As of the date of receipt of an order to stay proceedings in a company employees are deemed terminated and rehired by a new employer
Labor Law and Immigration
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
An employee who worked for a company that underwent economic rehabilitation pursuant to an issuance of a stay of proceedings order, was terminated several years later and demanded severance pay for the entire duration of his employment with the company, including before the company’s economic rehabilitation. The Supreme Court held that the employee is not […]
An employer who is aware of an employee’s breach of confidentiality towards it previous employer may be liable to such previous employer
Labor Law and Immigration
Dispute Resolution
An employee transitioned from one business to another contacting former clients and utilizing confidential business information obtained during his previous role. The new employer was aware of the confidentiality obligations the employee had undertaken toward his former employer and encouraged his move to compete with that employer directly. The Labor Court held that both the […]