An amendment to the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance (Amendment No. 216) was published January 5, 2016, under which the corporate tax rate under the Israeli Tax Ordinance from 26.5% to 25%. This amendment is effective January 1, 2016.
Related articles
An organ in a company cannot be both liable because of its position and independently
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
People who entered into transactions with a company contended that a director was liable to them for failed transactions – once by virtue of her position as a director, and once personally for her actions. The Court rejected the claim. Israeli law stipulates that a company is liable for an action performed by its organ. […]
A bankrupt person cannot file class claims or other proceedings without prior approval of the officer appointed to such person
High-Tech and Technology
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A bankrupt person filed a class-claim against the Afik & Co. law firm, as well as against many other businesses, alleging non-compliance with the website’s accessibility requirement, when he did not make any prior approach and when it was a duplicate lawsuit and when certain businesses had already compromised with him and paid him money […]
A participation in a joint venture does not grant a right to receive accounts if no partnership relationship existed between the parties
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A college and a private person established a joint venture in which a pest control course was offered at the college. The college financed the course and also undertook to bear the losses, while the person built the course structure. The person contended that he did not receive the profits he was entitled to from […]
Failure to pay an employee due to an insolvency due to the Covid-19 epidemic does not justify piercing the corporate veil and personal liabilities of shareholders
Labor Law and Immigration
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A kitchen worker at a restaurant resigned after not being paid his rights. The employee demanded that the company shareholders pay his rights personally by piercing the corporate veil as they are engaged in operating restaurants through the serial establishment of companies, liquidating them and changing the names of the restaurants to avoid debts. The […]