Legal Updates

Extreme unfairness can trump over the writing requirement in a real estate transaction

November 5, 2015
Print

Parties to a real estate transaction did not sign a written agreement but only a notarized general power of attorney.‎

The Court held that section 8 of the Israeli Land Law requires the existence of ‎a written document for a valid real estate transaction. The meaning of this provision is that without a ‎written document no valid transaction exists. However, the good faith principal will trump the writing requirement in exceptional ‎circumstances.‎

In this case the "cry of fairness" exists, because it was proven that the consideration orally agreed was paid, possession was transferred and the purchaser used the property as an owner ‎including leasing it out and mainly by taking a mortgage and paying it for seven years. The sellers acted fraudulently and ‎entered the apartment ‎years after execution of the power of attorney and after receiving the agreed ‎consideration and took advantage of the ‎fact that the apartment was still registered under their names to argue that ‎it belongs to them. ‎ Thus, the good faith requirement will trump the writing requirement