Cellular operator purchased cell phones and imported them to Israel while some of the devices were purchased, for promotional and spare parts, at a reduced or free cost. The Customs Authority required to calculate the value of the transaction in accordance with the value of the products and not in accordance with the reduced price at which they were actually purchased. The court ruled that customs fees should be paid in accordance with the actual amount paid and not in accordance with the normal goods price. Customs payment is in accordance with the percentage of customs stipulated in regulations double the value of the goods, except for goods that are subject to customs exemption law. In addition, some goods also have a sales tax, which is similarly calculated. In principle, only when the value of the goods cannot be estimated according to the value of the transaction - the price actually paid or payable under the transaction, for example when the consideration cannot be calculated or there are conditions for payment, the customs authority may assess the goods according to similar products. Here, the cellular operator purchased the cell phones as part of a deal where he received some of the discounted promotional devices while pledging to give them to public opinion leaders and renters for free. In addition, they received 5% cost-free devices, in exchange for releasing the supplier from warranty duties on the products he provided and subject to the additional devices to not be sold to customers, is an economic transaction for all purposes, where the value of the supplier's warranty removal is embodied in the price of the devices supplied free of charge. Therefore, the price of the instruments for customs purposes should be examined according to the price actually paid and not according to the value of the goods.
Published in Afik News 290 28.08.2019
Related articles
A lessee of a commercial property who unilaterally offsets its expenses from the rent may be deemed in breach of the agreement
Real Estate
Dispute Resolution
A lessee unilaterally offset the cost of installing a central air conditioning system from its rent, contrary to the provisions of the lease agreement that prohibits this. As a result, the lessee was demanded to vacate the leased property. The Court accepted the eviction claim and held that the lessee breached the lease agreement and […]
Parties bound by an agreement with a condition precedent must act positively for its fulfilment
Real Estate
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
A potential tenant did not act with sufficient diligence to enter into a lease agreement with the landlord and thus, in practice, prevented the fulfilment of the condition precedent in the agreement between it and the current tenant. The Court accepted the claim due to consummation of the agreement in bad faith. An agreement with […]
A person who has the most affinities to an asset may be liable to city taxes even if he is not the possessor of the asset
Taxation and Government Incentives and Funding
Dispute Resolution
Wills and Estates
A municipality recorded a person as the owner of his deceased mother’s property despite the absence of a probate order while stating that he has the most affinities to the property. When the city tax debts were not paid, the municipality-imposed a lien on his bank account. The Court rejected the claim for damage due […]
Receiving messages from a dating site against the will of the recipient does not necessarily amount to defamation
Privacy, GDPR, Confidentiality and protection of reputation
Dispute Resolution
A lawyer received offers that men were interested in getting to know her against her will, including to her professional email address, from an anonymous dating website to which she did not register and even requested to remove herself from. The Court held that sending the messages does not amount to defamation. Israeli law stipulates […]