Cellular operator purchased cell phones and imported them to Israel while some of the devices were purchased, for promotional and spare parts, at a reduced or free cost. The Customs Authority required to calculate the value of the transaction in accordance with the value of the products and not in accordance with the reduced price at which they were actually purchased. The court ruled that customs fees should be paid in accordance with the actual amount paid and not in accordance with the normal goods price. Customs payment is in accordance with the percentage of customs stipulated in regulations double the value of the goods, except for goods that are subject to customs exemption law. In addition, some goods also have a sales tax, which is similarly calculated. In principle, only when the value of the goods cannot be estimated according to the value of the transaction - the price actually paid or payable under the transaction, for example when the consideration cannot be calculated or there are conditions for payment, the customs authority may assess the goods according to similar products. Here, the cellular operator purchased the cell phones as part of a deal where he received some of the discounted promotional devices while pledging to give them to public opinion leaders and renters for free. In addition, they received 5% cost-free devices, in exchange for releasing the supplier from warranty duties on the products he provided and subject to the additional devices to not be sold to customers, is an economic transaction for all purposes, where the value of the supplier's warranty removal is embodied in the price of the devices supplied free of charge. Therefore, the price of the instruments for customs purposes should be examined according to the price actually paid and not according to the value of the goods.
Published in Afik News 290 28.08.2019
Related articles
When the dispute remains alive, a claim for offset can be raised even after the cause of action’s statute of limitation period has expired
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Public Law, Elections Law and Tenders
Dispute Resolution
A company sought to offset royalty amounts that were collected in excess from future royalties to the Israel Land Authority. This was done in light of the fact that the statute of limitation period for the cause of action for the collection in excess expired and the Israel Land Authority knew that the company maintains […]
Purchasers who lawfully rescinded a contract are entitled to restitution of consideration at the real value based on the apartment’s current market price
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Dispute Resolution
Apartment purchasers filed an action against a contractor demanding the rescission of the sale agreement and restitution of the consideration, after they were provided with a non-compliant parking space that could not be reasonably utilized. The Court accepted the claim for rescission of the agreement and held that the breaches by the contractor were fundamental […]
A framework relationship contract is a general agreement that is open to changes and updates in matters that the parties to the contract have chosen not to settle in advance
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
Holders of rights of residential units in a luxury hotel demanded the hotel owners to appoint an internationally renowned management company to manage the hotel as well as refrain from raising the management fees. The Supreme Court held that the agreement is a closed agreement and there is no reason to obligate or prevent the […]
A negative past record may result in the disqualification of a tender bid
Public Law, Elections Law and Tenders
Dispute Resolution
A tenders committee disqualified a sole bid in a tender for the provision of cleaning services due to the bidder’s negative past record. The Court dismissed the petition and held that the tenders committee’s decision to reject the bid based on the negative record was free of flaw. Intervention in the professional discretion of the […]