Cellular operator purchased cell phones and imported them to Israel while some of the devices were purchased, for promotional and spare parts, at a reduced or free cost. The Customs Authority required to calculate the value of the transaction in accordance with the value of the products and not in accordance with the reduced price at which they were actually purchased. The court ruled that customs fees should be paid in accordance with the actual amount paid and not in accordance with the normal goods price. Customs payment is in accordance with the percentage of customs stipulated in regulations double the value of the goods, except for goods that are subject to customs exemption law. In addition, some goods also have a sales tax, which is similarly calculated. In principle, only when the value of the goods cannot be estimated according to the value of the transaction - the price actually paid or payable under the transaction, for example when the consideration cannot be calculated or there are conditions for payment, the customs authority may assess the goods according to similar products. Here, the cellular operator purchased the cell phones as part of a deal where he received some of the discounted promotional devices while pledging to give them to public opinion leaders and renters for free. In addition, they received 5% cost-free devices, in exchange for releasing the supplier from warranty duties on the products he provided and subject to the additional devices to not be sold to customers, is an economic transaction for all purposes, where the value of the supplier's warranty removal is embodied in the price of the devices supplied free of charge. Therefore, the price of the instruments for customs purposes should be examined according to the price actually paid and not according to the value of the goods.
Published in Afik News 290 28.08.2019
Related articles
One cannot deduct from an employee’s salary to cover future expenses
Sports Law
Labor Law
Dispute Resolution
Wage deductions under the component of a “deposit” were made from the salary of a brazilian football player who played for the Maccabi Haifa football club during his final months of employment. The said deductions were intended to secure the payment of the player’s future expenses, such as debts for traffic fines, housing bills, and […]
A Broker may be entitled to brokerage fees from related parties in the event that it served as an “effective cause” for the transaction
Mergers and Acquisitions
Dispute Resolution
Commercial, Banking and Financial
A middleman entered into an agreement with parties to an acquisition transaction, under which it was intended to receive brokerage fees. After the deal fell through, some of the involved parties established a new company that ultimately executed the deal and made the acquisition, without paying the brokerage fees. The Court held that the middleman […]
The Maritime Court in Israel has the jurisdiction to arrest any vessel anchored in Israel and to hear in rem claims against it
Maritime, Aviation and Transportation Law
Dispute Resolution
A fuel supplier from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, supplied fuel in Turkey and Malta to a Russian-registered cargo ship and sought to enforce a maritime lien against the vessel in Haifa in respect of a debt. Meanwhile, the ship was sold to another owner who repudiated the fuel supplier’s maritime lien. The Court dismissed the […]
In a commercial independent contractor agreement, a party does not have the unilateral authority to impose an interim state of unpaid suspension during a dispute
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Labor Law
Dispute Resolution
Natan Zehavi, a Radio Le-Lo Hafsaka broadcaster provided broadcasting services to the radio station as an independent contractor. Following a controversial on-air statement, the station suspended the broadcaster without pay and refused to reinstate him without receiving new financial guarantees on his part. However, the station refrained from formally terminating the agreement, thereby keeping his […]