Cellular operator purchased cell phones and imported them to Israel while some of the devices were purchased, for promotional and spare parts, at a reduced or free cost. The Customs Authority required to calculate the value of the transaction in accordance with the value of the products and not in accordance with the reduced price at which they were actually purchased. The court ruled that customs fees should be paid in accordance with the actual amount paid and not in accordance with the normal goods price. Customs payment is in accordance with the percentage of customs stipulated in regulations double the value of the goods, except for goods that are subject to customs exemption law. In addition, some goods also have a sales tax, which is similarly calculated. In principle, only when the value of the goods cannot be estimated according to the value of the transaction - the price actually paid or payable under the transaction, for example when the consideration cannot be calculated or there are conditions for payment, the customs authority may assess the goods according to similar products. Here, the cellular operator purchased the cell phones as part of a deal where he received some of the discounted promotional devices while pledging to give them to public opinion leaders and renters for free. In addition, they received 5% cost-free devices, in exchange for releasing the supplier from warranty duties on the products he provided and subject to the additional devices to not be sold to customers, is an economic transaction for all purposes, where the value of the supplier's warranty removal is embodied in the price of the devices supplied free of charge. Therefore, the price of the instruments for customs purposes should be examined according to the price actually paid and not according to the value of the goods.
Published in Afik News 290 28.08.2019
Related articles
A banking corporation owes a heightened duty of trust and care toward its customers in safeguarding their funds and overseeing its agents
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
Through fraudulent means and by presenting forged vouchers, approximately ILS 48,000 was withdrawn from a customer account at the Postal Bank. The Postal Bank refused to reimburse the funds, contending that they must await a police investigation, while simultaneously freezing the account-leaving the customers without their money and in prolonged uncertainty. The Court accepted the […]
A hearing based solely on suspicions, without evidence or prior warnings, constitutes a compensable flaw
Labor Law
Dispute Resolution
A veteran employee was dismissed from his job after the company changed ownership and the previous manager opened a competing business. The company suspected that the employee, who maintained friendly relations with the previous manager and even visited his business, was passing information and clients to him, and summoned him to a hearing regarding these […]
A party who prevented the performance of the agreement in bad faith is not entitled to rely on the expiration of the time limit for its cancellation
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
Parties to a real estate dispute signed a settlement agreement whereby one party would purchase the rights of the other party, subject to the provision of ownership documents within six months. The selling party concealed a material inheritance order in its possession, and subsequently contended that the agreement had expired due to the passage of […]
Non-termination of a contract despite misrepresentation leaves the tenant’s obligations intact
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Dispute Resolution
A landlord and a tenant signed a lease agreement for a store. The landlord made a misrepresentation that the store also includes an outdoor dining area. The tenant continued to hold and use the leased premises, but refrained from paying rent and municipal taxes claiming misrepresentation and a right of set-off. The Court held that […]