Cellular operator purchased cell phones and imported them to Israel while some of the devices were purchased, for promotional and spare parts, at a reduced or free cost. The Customs Authority required to calculate the value of the transaction in accordance with the value of the products and not in accordance with the reduced price at which they were actually purchased. The court ruled that customs fees should be paid in accordance with the actual amount paid and not in accordance with the normal goods price. Customs payment is in accordance with the percentage of customs stipulated in regulations double the value of the goods, except for goods that are subject to customs exemption law. In addition, some goods also have a sales tax, which is similarly calculated. In principle, only when the value of the goods cannot be estimated according to the value of the transaction - the price actually paid or payable under the transaction, for example when the consideration cannot be calculated or there are conditions for payment, the customs authority may assess the goods according to similar products. Here, the cellular operator purchased the cell phones as part of a deal where he received some of the discounted promotional devices while pledging to give them to public opinion leaders and renters for free. In addition, they received 5% cost-free devices, in exchange for releasing the supplier from warranty duties on the products he provided and subject to the additional devices to not be sold to customers, is an economic transaction for all purposes, where the value of the supplier's warranty removal is embodied in the price of the devices supplied free of charge. Therefore, the price of the instruments for customs purposes should be examined according to the price actually paid and not according to the value of the goods.
Published in Afik News 290 28.08.2019
Related articles
Depriving the tenant of an option without a real intention to sell the property is an abuse of a contractual right
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Dispute Resolution
Landlords notified the tenants of the termination of the lease and prevented them from exercising an option, contending that they intended to sell the apartment. In practice, the apartment was not sold but was rented to others at higher rents, and the tenants were forced to rent another apartment at a higher price. The Court […]
Attributing a debt to shareholders of a mother company require two processes of piercing the corporate veil
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A manpower agency provided employees to a company operating a nursing home. The nursing home ran into financial difficulties, ceased operations, and owed money to the manpower agency, who demanded them also from a person who was the shareholders of the holding company of the company managing the hotel and the director of the operating […]
A prolonged failure to act upon a contract may cause the agreement to lapse without requiring a formal cancellation notice
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
A company engaged in consulting and exercising rights demanded to receive legal fees from a client after about a decade, contending that it referred it to legal representation that led to a reduction in lease fees vis-à-vis the Tel Aviv Municipality. The Court rejected the claim and held that the agreement had been abandoned by […]
An “AS IS” clause does not override the duty of good faith and the prohibition of misrepresentation.
Mergers and Acquisitions
Dispute Resolution
A couple invested in a startup for distributing online courses. The project developers presented them with a representation that the technological system was almost completely ready, of high quality, and that significant resources had been invested in it. The agreement between the parties stated that the system is purchased in its current condition (“AS IS”). […]