Cellular operator purchased cell phones and imported them to Israel while some of the devices were purchased, for promotional and spare parts, at a reduced or free cost. The Customs Authority required to calculate the value of the transaction in accordance with the value of the products and not in accordance with the reduced price at which they were actually purchased. The court ruled that customs fees should be paid in accordance with the actual amount paid and not in accordance with the normal goods price. Customs payment is in accordance with the percentage of customs stipulated in regulations double the value of the goods, except for goods that are subject to customs exemption law. In addition, some goods also have a sales tax, which is similarly calculated. In principle, only when the value of the goods cannot be estimated according to the value of the transaction - the price actually paid or payable under the transaction, for example when the consideration cannot be calculated or there are conditions for payment, the customs authority may assess the goods according to similar products. Here, the cellular operator purchased the cell phones as part of a deal where he received some of the discounted promotional devices while pledging to give them to public opinion leaders and renters for free. In addition, they received 5% cost-free devices, in exchange for releasing the supplier from warranty duties on the products he provided and subject to the additional devices to not be sold to customers, is an economic transaction for all purposes, where the value of the supplier's warranty removal is embodied in the price of the devices supplied free of charge. Therefore, the price of the instruments for customs purposes should be examined according to the price actually paid and not according to the value of the goods.
Published in Afik News 290 28.08.2019
Related articles
A work photographed outside of Israel will enjoy copyright protection in Israel if it was first published in Israel
Copyright, Trademarks Media and Artists
Dispute Resolution
A business published a Yom Kippur greeting on social media using a photograph taken in Congo and published for the first time by the photographer in Israel. The Court accepted the photographer’s claim for copyright infringement. Under Israeli law, a “photographic work” may be deemed a protected “artistic work” when the creator showed its originality […]
A company filing a claim need show financial robustness and existence of assets is not sufficient for exemption from placing a guarantee
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A company was required to place a guarantee as part of a lawsuit it filed, even though it owns assets worth dozens of times more than the amount of the guarantee. The Court accepted the motion to deposit a guarantee due to company’s failure to meet the threshold required to establish financial stability. When a […]
A check filled out by an attorney and deposited against express authorization will not be honored
Real Estate
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
A lessee gave checks to the attorney of the apartment owner, an elderly woman under nursing care, for the rent, without specifying the name of the payee. A month prior the end of the lease, the lessee located a potential tenant to replace him under the agreement terms, but when he reached to get the […]
Giving a false statement in an expedited procedure for voluntary liquidation regarding the absence of debts of the company is grounds for piercing the corporate veil
Copyright, Trademarks Media and Artists
Dispute Resolution
A company ordered a video production service but did not pay for it. The shareholder was demanded to pay the debt personally after it became clear that he filed a motion to liquidate the company in an expedited process of where he declared that the company has no debts, knowingly this is not the case. […]