Afik News 229 25.04.2017

Afik News 229 25.04.2017

Print
PDF

Legislative Updates

April 12, 2017

Non transfer of social deductions of employees is ground for piercing the corporate veil

An employee filed a claim for non-payment of various social rights to which she entitled to for the period of her employment and moved the Court to pierce the corporate veil and obligate the sole shareholder (who was also the sole director) for the company’s debts...

April 5, 2017

Court may pierce the corporate vail and obligate sole shareholder and director in company’s liabilities where the company will not be able to pay its debts‎

Company employees were illegally dismissed and the Labor Court awarded them compensation. The National Labor Court also pierced the corporate veil between the company and a newly incorporated sister company that in effect tsook over the employees, customers and reputation and continued the company's operations from the same factory, emptying the first company...

April 13, 2017

A trade-in company has increased liability and is required to make full due diligence disclosure in a form separate from the car sale agreement

A person purchased a car in a trade-in transaction from a company that deals in trade-in and based on a representation that the vehicle was in private hands in the past. In retrospect, it was discovered that the vehicle was previously owned by a company. The trade-in company argued, inter alia, that the car purchase agreement contained a clause exempting it from liability...

April 6, 2017

An agreement provision referring to legal change will apply only in case of change of law or case law of the Supreme Court

A petrol station and a petrol supplier executed a settlement agreement regarding issues of antitrust.  The agreement set certain terms that will apply in case of a "legal change."  After the District Courts granted two verdicts that changed the caselaw as to the issues related to the agreement one of the parties demanded to apply the agreement provision...

March 29, 2017

Passengers of a delayed flight are entitled to monetary compensation unless an unforeseeable force majeure

A flight was delayed by 17 hours and the passengers’ demand for compensation was rejected by the airline, claiming that it was a technical problem of a security nature and therefore due to such special circumstances they are not entitled to compensation by law...

April 4, 2017

Handing over possession of an apartment without a population form (Form 4) is not a due transfer of possession

Purchasers of a new apartment from a contractor claimed that the possession of the apartment was not duly delivered to them, because a population form (form 4) was not duly given on the date stipulated in the contract and therefore demanded compensation...

Share